I've refrained from writing about the 2016 Republican election
here at all, mostly because I've been too busy. (If you're wondering,
though, I'm firmly in the #NeverTrump camp.) However, I came up with
something recently that I think helps to explain the frenetic nature of the current
Republican race. I'll briefly describe that here.
The reason I think that the party feels like it's a
very tense breaking point, in my opinion, is because of overlapping voter
groups within the GOP.
The Republican electorate is made up of five disparate kinds of
voters right now. I'll lay them out briefly below, from most conservative
to least.
Group number one I like to call the Far Right.
This voting block includes die-hard Tea Partiers, many conservative-minded
libertarians, and those for whom the Second Amendment and illegal immigration
are primary issues. Voters in this group tend to reflexively dislike or
blame Obama, "the liberals," or the government in general for
society's problems. They are often working-class or middle-class
economically, with a deep-seated distrust of authority. Due to their
belief in American exceptionalism, they occasionally hold isolationist viewpoints on foreign policy. This election, they're rather angry and fed up with the lack of conservative solutions being put in action by mainstream Republican lawmakers.
Next come Social Conservatives. They vote
Republican due to a strong belief in Judeo-Christian moral values. They
view Republicans as aligned with this moral tradition and working to preserve
it in society. Their primary issues of concern are social trends in the
country that they see as corrupting the culture at the root level of the
family: governmental endorsement of same-sex marriage, abortion on demand, and
a disregard for religious liberty. Social Conservatives vote for
Republicans who they hope will curtail or reverse these trends. Along
with the Far Right, these voters make up the grassroots of the Republican
party.
After Social Conservatives come the Establishment GOP
voters. Frequently accused of being RINOs ("Republican in name
only") by the Far Right, these voters cast their ballots to support GOP
candidates because they believe that general Republican principles can govern
the country better overall than liberal ones. Establishment voters may
include "compassionate conservatives" like George W. Bush or John
McCain, Republicans who think that government programs can be used selectively
to cure some social ills. This is the hardest voting group to
positively define.
Fourth in line are Moderates. These individuals
vote Republican for a variety of disparate reasons, but often because they
happen to like the Republican candidate today better than the Democratic one.
They hang out in the middle of the political spectrum and don't pick any
cohesive side. They may have sympathy with both liberal and conservative
points of view. The Far Right and Social Conservatives alike heap
disdain on these voters, terming them "squishy" and
"unprincipled" - the real RINOs.
Finally, the Blue Dog Democrats. These guys are
Democrats disillusioned with their own party for one reason or another.
Many still hold mostly liberal values, and may be registered Democrats.
However, whether it's dislike of the Democratic candidates or
dissatisfaction with how Democrats are addressing a particular issue, or even
attraction to a Republican candidate who they feel will "shake up"
the political landscape, they vote Republican in primaries. In a general
election for President, though, their allegiance to the Democratic party may
prevail.
My big theory is that each of the remaining Republican
presidential candidates is primarily pulling from two of these five
voting groups, as detailed below:
Trump = Blue Dog Democrats + Far Right
Cruz = Far Right + Social Conservatives
Rubio = Social Conservatives + Establishment
Kasich = Establishment + Moderates
I
think viewing the electoral field in this way provides a lot of clarity into
where the conflicts are in the current Republican race for president. What do you think? Let me know in the comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment